Find your fit · 60 seconds, no email
Where should I start?
Take the 60-second bucket test. We'll route you to the offer that matches what you're trying to answer this quarter. Not the tier that looks "best." If none of them fit, the option to talk to a human is at the bottom.
0 of 8 answered
~60 seconds
- 01
Code access
Your QA team has read + write access to all relevant repos (frontend, backend, infra, tests).
Including the ability to add data-testid attributes and modify backend behavior in preview environments.
- 02
Environment control
Your team can spin up an ephemeral environment (with seeded DB) without filing a ticket.
Self-service preview environments + reproducible seed data are the foundation.
- 03
Observability
An AI agent can read application logs, traces, network calls, and DB state during test runs.
Not through a separate UI. Directly, programmatically, in the same workspace.
- 04
AI tooling
Claude Code (or equivalent) is licensed and authorized to execute commands without per-step approval.
Run shell, edit files, execute tests, iterate. Without stopping every few seconds.
- 05
Test infrastructure
Playwright + a unit framework are installed; tests are runnable from CLI with machine-readable results.
Stable test IDs, page objects, programmatic auth setup. The foundation that lets AI write tests that compound.
- 06
Team capability
Your team has Playwright depth and can audit AI-generated code for correctness across the stack.
AI fluency without engineering depth produces test bloat. Both are required.
- 07
Organizational permissions
An engineering sponsor can clear blockers and authorize cross-stack changes without ticket queues.
The most common reason adoption stalls. Political, not technical.
- 08
Pipeline readiness
Your team has built (or can build) custom multi-stage AI pipelines. Not just a single prompt.
Orchestrators with planning, execution, verification, and review stages.
No email required · Result is private to this browser
The offer ladder
Four tiers. One question each.
Pick by what you're trying to answer this quarter. Not by what tier looks "best." The depth of change escalates with the question. The entry course is publicly priced; higher tiers are scoped per engagement.
- 01$1,000 / seat
“Teach me the model.”
Doing More With Less in QA
- Duration
- 1 day
- Scope
- Individual leader
- ROI by
- 90-day plan, same week
You leave with the framework, the worksheets, and a 90-day plan you can hand to your boss on Monday.
See this tier → - 02Scoped per engagement
“Apply the model to my current QA team.”
QA Leverage Review
- Duration
- 1 day · private
- Scope
- QA team only
- ROI by
- Top-5 moves named the same day
An outside diagnosis built around your team. You leave with the top-5 leverage opportunities, scored, and a 90-day plan ready for leadership.
See this tier → - 03Scoped per engagement
“Redesign our company-wide quality strategy.”
Quality Strategy & Leadership Alignment
- Duration
- 3–6 weeks
- Scope
- QA + engineering + product + executives
- ROI by
- Cross-functional ownership reset in week 4
Cross-functional alignment, ownership clarity, and a 90-day implementation roadmap. Backed by 3 follow-up reviews so the strategy actually ships.
See this tier → - 04Scoped per engagement
“Lead the transformation.”
Quality Transformation Sprint
- Duration
- 6–10 weeks
- Scope
- Org-wide implementation
- ROI by
- Visible ROI by week 8
Quality intelligence dashboard, AI/automation pilot, manager operating cadence, and 180-day roadmap. Built into how the team actually works, not delivered as a deck.
See this tier →
Most clients move up the ladder one tier at a time. Skipping tiers works only when the depth of change you need is obvious from the start.
Still not sure
Book a 30-minute call.
For QA leaders whose situation doesn't map cleanly onto a tier. Or who'd rather talk than self-route. 30 minutes, no pitch deck, no sales calendar follow-up.
Email Ben to book →