RESTful vs. SOAP: What's the Best for API Testing?

Ben Fellows


Welcome to our blog post on comparing RESTful and SOAP APIs for API testing! APIs, or Application Programming Interfaces, play a crucial role in connecting different software systems and enabling them to communicate and exchange data. As the complexity of modern applications continues to grow, the importance of thorough API testing becomes even more evident. In this blog post, we will explore the concepts of RESTful and SOAP APIs and compare their features, advantages, and considerations when it comes to testing.

Understanding RESTful APIs

RESTful APIs, also known as Representational State Transfer APIs, are a popular architectural style for designing web services. They are characterized by a set of guiding principles that promote scalability, simplicity, and interoperability.

Statelessness and Uniform Interface

One of the fundamental characteristics of RESTful APIs is statelessness. This means that each request from a client to a server should contain all the necessary information for the server to understand and process it. The server should not rely on any previous requests or maintain any session state. This statelessness makes RESTful APIs highly scalable and allows them to handle a large number of concurrent requests.

RESTful APIs also adhere to a uniform interface, which means they have a standardized set of HTTP methods (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE) that map to specific operations on resources. These methods provide a consistent and predictable way of interacting with the API, making it easier for developers to understand and use.

Resource-oriented Architecture

RESTful APIs are designed around the concept of resources, which are entities that can be accessed and manipulated through the API. Each resource should have a unique identifier, usually represented by a URL. API endpoints are used to specify the resources and the operations that can be performed on them.

This resource-oriented architecture allows for a logical and hierarchical organization of the API. It enables developers to design APIs that closely resemble the structure and behavior of the underlying system, making it intuitive to work with.

Use of HTTP Methods (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE)

RESTful APIs utilize the HTTP protocol as the underlying communication protocol. Different HTTP methods are used to perform different operations on resources. The GET method is used to retrieve a representation of a resource, while the POST method is used to create a new resource. The PUT method is used to update an existing resource, and the DELETE method is used to remove a resource.

The use of standard HTTP methods simplifies the API design and ensures interoperability. It allows developers to leverage existing HTTP libraries and tools to interact with the API, reducing development time and effort.

In conclusion, understanding the characteristics and principles of RESTful APIs is crucial for effectively working with and testing them. Their statelessness and uniform interface, resource-oriented architecture, and use of HTTP methods provide a solid foundation for building scalable and interoperable web services.

Understanding SOAP APIs

SOAP (Simple Object Access Protocol) APIs are a widely-used technology for exchanging structured and formalized data between different applications over a network. They are based on an XML-based messaging protocol, which enables the communication between the client and the server. SOAP APIs offer extensive support for complex transactions, making them suitable for enterprise-level applications where reliability and security are paramount.

XML-based messaging protocol

SOAP APIs use XML (eXtensible Markup Language) as their messaging protocol. XML provides a standardized and platform-independent way to structure and represent data, making it ideal for interoperability between different systems. The XML format allows developers to define their own custom data structures using XML schema definitions, ensuring consistency and flexibility in the data exchanged.

Structured and formalized approach

SOAP APIs follow a structured and formalized approach to define the messages and operations supported by the API. This is achieved through the use of Web Services Description Language (WSDL), which provides a machine-readable description of the SOAP API and its individual methods. WSDL allows clients to understand the available operations, their input and output parameters, and the expected message formats.

Extensive support for complex transactions

One of the key advantages of SOAP APIs is their ability to handle complex transactions. SOAP supports ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) transactions, which ensure that multiple operations are executed as a single unit. This makes SOAP APIs suitable for applications that require transactional integrity, such as banking systems, where it is critical to maintain data consistency and accuracy.

Comparing RESTful and SOAP for API Testing

When it comes to API testing, it is important to consider the differences between RESTful and SOAP protocols. These two protocols have distinct characteristics, and understanding their strengths and weaknesses will help in making an informed decision.

Evaluating the overhead and efficiency of each protocol

RESTful APIs are known for their lightweight and simplicity. They use standard HTTP methods like GET, POST, PUT, and DELETE, making it easier to understand and implement. With RESTful APIs, there is minimal overhead since they do not require additional messaging layers like SOAP. The simplicity of RESTful APIs also results in faster development and testing cycles.

On the other hand, SOAP APIs use XML messaging format along with the SOAP envelope, which adds a layer of complexity. This complexity can result in slower response times and increased processing overhead. SOAP APIs also require additional libraries or toolkits to handle the XML parsing, which may further impact the efficiency of the testing process.

Considering the impact on response times and server load

RESTful APIs generally have faster response times compared to SOAP APIs. Since they have a simpler structure and rely on standard HTTP methods, RESTful APIs can often deliver responses more quickly. This can be advantageous in scenarios where real-time data is required or when testing high-volume requests.

SOAP APIs, due to their XML messaging format and additional layers, can have slower response times. The XML parsing and processing required by SOAP APIs can put a heavier load on servers and impact performance. When testing SOAP APIs, it is important to consider their potential impact on server load and optimize accordingly.

However, it is worth noting that the performance differences between RESTful and SOAP APIs might be negligible in certain scenarios. The factors that influence response times and server load can vary depending on the specific implementation and infrastructure.

Understanding the trade-offs

The choice between RESTful and SOAP for API testing should not solely be based on performance considerations. Other factors, such as the type of application and data requirements, the skill set and familiarity of the development team, as well as integration with existing systems and tools, should also be taken into account.

RESTful APIs are generally more suitable for simpler applications where speed and efficiency are prioritized. They are a good fit for web and mobile applications that require quick and lightweight data retrieval. RESTful APIs also align well with the principles of modern web development and make use of popular technologies like JSON for data exchange.

SOAP APIs, on the other hand, are better suited for complex systems that require reliable and secure messaging. They provide built-in support for features such as message integrity, confidentiality, and authentication. SOAP APIs are often used in enterprise-level applications with legacy systems and a need for more robust error handling and data validation.

Ultimately, the choice between RESTful and SOAP for API testing will depend on the specific requirements and goals of the project. It is important to carefully evaluate the trade-offs associated with each protocol and consider the long-term implications of the chosen approach.


In conclusion, choosing the appropriate API protocol for testing is crucial for ensuring the success of your testing strategy. In this blog post, we have discussed the key points to consider when making this decision.

Recap of Key Points

We began by discussing the different API protocols available, such as REST, SOAP, GraphQL, and gRPC. Each protocol has its own advantages and considerations, and it is important to understand these differences before making a choice.

Furthermore, we highlighted the importance of considering factors such as scalability, flexibility, and complexity when choosing an API protocol. This will help ensure that your testing strategy aligns with your project goals and requirements.

Importance of Choosing the Appropriate API Protocol

Choosing the appropriate API protocol is critical because it directly impacts the effectiveness and efficiency of your testing efforts. By selecting the right protocol, you can streamline your testing process, improve test coverage, and identify potential issues early on.

For example, if your application relies heavily on data queries and retrieval, a protocol like GraphQL might be more suitable. On the other hand, if structured XML messages are a key component of your system, SOAP could be the better choice.

Encouragement to Experiment and Explore

We encourage you to experiment and explore different options for API testing. Consider taking advantage of tools and frameworks that offer support for multiple protocols, allowing you to compare and contrast the advantages of each.

By actively exploring various API protocols, you can refine your testing approach and gain a deeper understanding of how different protocols impact your application's performance and functionality.

Remember, choosing an API protocol for testing is not a one-size-fits-all situation. It requires careful consideration of your project requirements, goals, and available resources.

Ultimately, by selecting the appropriate API protocol, you can elevate your testing efforts and deliver a high-quality and reliable application to your end-users.

More from Loop

Get updates on Loop's best content

Stay in touch as we publish more great Quality Assurance content!